But the treaty (see the links to the treaty itself and related conventions at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty ) says that a "review of treaty operations" can be held 30 years from initial signature of the treaty...
No such "review" has yet been held...
====
Also any signatory is apparently allowed to back out of the treaty on 2 years notice.
====
As far as I know, all State Parties currently support the treaty and related conventions as they stand.
====
The US link for the treaty (and current US policy) is: http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/antarct/anttrty.htm
> Hugs. I hope you're doing ok.
Pretty well. Houston seems to be the City of the Possible, at least so far.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-06 07:56 pm (UTC)Hugs. I hope you're doing ok.
Already Expired
Date: 2004-09-06 08:54 pm (UTC)It's already expired.
But the treaty (see the links to the treaty itself and related conventions at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty ) says that a "review of treaty operations" can be held 30 years from initial signature of the treaty...
No such "review" has yet been held...
====
Also any signatory is apparently allowed to back out of the treaty on 2 years notice.
====
As far as I know, all State Parties currently support the treaty and related conventions as they stand.
====
The US link for the treaty (and current US policy) is: http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/antarct/anttrty.htm
> Hugs. I hope you're doing ok.
Pretty well. Houston seems to be the City of the Possible, at least so far.
Re: Already Expired
Date: 2004-09-06 09:01 pm (UTC)So far so good, I guess.
Pretty well. Houston seems to be the City of the Possible, at least so far.
I'm so glad!
no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 09:03 am (UTC)Unsure whether I'll be able to get out to Houston next weekend, though - haven't gotten any response to my request to swap on-call...